Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, Universityof Wisconsin - Green Bay
First-time Visitors: Please visit Site Map and Disclaimer. Use"Back" to return here.
I will respond to questions and comments as time permits, but if you want to take issuewith any position expressed here, you first have to answer this question:
What evidence would it take to prove your beliefs wrong?
I simply will not reply to challenges that do not address this question. Refutabilityis one of the classic determinants of whether a theory can be called scientific. Moreover,I have found it to be a great general-purpose cut-through-the-crap question to determinewhether somebody is interested in serious intellectual inquiry or just playing mind games.Note, by the way, that I am assuming the burden of proof here - all youhave to do is commit to a criterion for testing.It's easy to criticize science for being "closed-minded". Are you open-mindedenough to consider whether your ideas might be wrong?
This listing omits the obvious choices like the Grand Canyon Rim Drive, Going to the Sun Highway, Cadillac Mountain in Acadia National Park, and so on. After all, those roads were built specifically to be scenic. These, on the other hand, are just ordinary highways.
The
You'd
hoo
There
Wh
M
bbb
oi'[[
oi[k
Return to Pseudoscience Index
Return to Professor Dutch's Home Page
Created 12 March 2007; Last Update 24 May, 2020
Not an official UW Green Bay site